Domestic Enemies Net

Anti-climate cult crusader calls for world to rise up against communistic killers behind global warming fraud

Lord Monckton: Shut Down The UN, Arrest The Warmist Criminals

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, November 28, 2009

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show yesterday, Lord Christopher Monckton went further than ever before in his vehement opposition to the elitists running the climate change scam, calling for the UN to be shut down and for fraudulent peddlers of global warming propaganda like Al Gore to be arrested and criminally prosecuted.

Monckton said that those who are threatening to shut down economies, bankrupt nations, and deepen the problems of the third world by implementing draconian policies in the name of global warming should be indicted, prosecuted and imprisoned “for a very long time”.

“The fraudsters and racketeers from Al Gore to the people at the University of East Anglia who have been making their fortune at the expense of taxpayers and the little guy,” should be criminally charged, said Monckton, in response to the climategate scandal.

“We the people have got to rise up worldwide, found a party in every country which stands for freedom and make sure we fight this bureaucratic communistic world government monster to a standstill – they shall not pass,” he added.

Monckton said that the United Nations should be “closed down,” adding that he talked to a senior UN ambassador in Canada who told him that he no longer saw any purpose in the UN and it exists “only to enrich itself at the expense of the nations it claims to serve, it’s time it was brought to an end.”

“We would all save billions if we shut down the UN and just about all of its hideous bureaucracy,” said Monckton.

Lord Monckton emphasized how the emails released as a result of climategate prove that global warming alarmism was still prevalent in public but behind closed doors, warmist scientist are admitting that the “deniers” as they label people like Monckton are correct.

“Publicly they’re saying the science is settled, we’re all doomed unless you close down the economies of the west, whereas privately they’re saying to each other ‘we’ve got it wrong, none of this adds up and it’s a travesty that we can’t explain it’.”

Monckton also slammed Obama’s science czar John P. Holdren, who in his 1977 book Ecoscience called for draconian population measures to be enforced by a “planetary regime” in the name of saving the earth, as an “openly admitted communist”.

Monckton pointed out how Holdren had been once of the most prominent alarmists in the 70’s warning about the onset of rapid “global cooling”.

“Now with seamless mendacity he says that what we’re now facing is global warming,” said Monckton.

“How can anyone like Holdren stand up with a straight face and expect anyone to believe it,” he added.

Monckton said that the agenda behind the global warming movement was to set up a communistic world government which will be run by people who “do not care how many people they kill with their policies” and that their goal is to “do away with democracy forever by stealth using the excuse to save the planet.”

Monckton said that the people running the scam had a “deliberate desire to control population by killing people in large numbers deliberately if necessary.”

The former advisor to Margaret Thatcher said that the warmists were sounding more and more desperate and knew that they had been rumbled as a result of climategate, which would only make it more urgent for them to try and force through a binding treaty in Copenhagen.

Monckton said that the answer to combating the move towards neo-feudalism and global government was to form a worldwide “freedom party” that would operate nationally in every country in order to defend freedom, democracy and prosperity while routing out every aspect of the communistic takeover.

“Every time these people try to take it away, we in the freedom party will stop them, and I think now is the time,” said Monckton.

November 25, 2009 (LPAC)—Not since Henry Kissinger fled a team of LaRouche organizers, in the back of a delivery truck in New York City’s Central Park in the early 1980s, has an obese fascist moved so fast to escape an angry crowd, as Al Gore did today in Chicago. Appearing at a bookstore in the downtown Loop, Gore was confronted by a team of demonstrators from a grass roots group called “We Are Change,” as he was signing his latest fascist screed on the global warming swindle. Gore bolted from the bookstore, raced down an alley, jumped into a waiting car, and tried to speed off, with protesters chasing after him and banging on the car. Midwest LYM organizers, who were also on the scene to confront the global warming swindler, provided an eyewitness account of Fat Albert’s flight of fear.

Make no mistake about it. This little encounter is typical of the kinds of things going on all over the country, as the fascists who brought you the near-destruction of the United States and an onrushing global Dark Age, are no longer walking the streets, smug in the belief that they are literally getting away with murder. The mass strike dynamic is playing out in thousands of ways, every day, and the recent revelations about the ’smoking gun’ emails from the East Anglia University global warming propaganda center, have made Al Gore’s life a little more miserable.

As Percy Shelley wrote in “The Mask of Anarchy,” “We are many, they are few.”

Do you know why Alex Jones is so effective?

Because he knows what NOT to talk about.

In the simplest of terms, take a lesson from Alex and keep Zionism and the Illuminati out of your discussion with the people you meet. There is enough out there when it comes to the globalist agenda so that these never need to be mentioned. In fact, not even the ‘new world order’ has to be mentioned.

You may know the groups behind the globalist movement. Those you talk with might eventually get there. But the important thing is getting the information out and getting others to look at if for themselves. This can probably best be accomplished with a burned copy of The Fall Of The Republic.

Mention the Jewish angle, and the response is likely to be, ‘Oh, you’re not one of them, are you?’ Even if they don’t express it verbally, what they have been fed through the media over the years will have them thinking you’re anti-semitic, and turn them off.

Mention the Illuminati, and the response is likely to be, ‘Oh, you’re one of those!’ because what they have been fed through the media over the years will have them thinking you’re just a nut into ‘conspiracy theories,’ and turn them off as well.

As for space aliens, lizard people and the Coast To Coast AM type stuff, forget it. Also forget the religious angle as well. You may know we are dealing with ‘powers and principalities,’ but unless someone is already on that wave length, you are not likely to win them over without a good deal of biblical education, and there just isn’t time.

So do what Alex does, and just stick to the basics. The enemy would like nothing better than to have your energy drained off into non-productive channels that are likely to just get you laughed at and ignored.

What Alex Jones talks about can be documented. It is in their writings and in the news. It is not theory but the reality in which we find ourselves, today. And as he has demonstrated, it is what really works. Use it.

If the recent good news about what was found by hackers at East Anglia University tells us anything about those dishonest cowards who dared pass themselves off as scientists, it is this:

THEY ARE LOSERS AND THEY LOST, TRUE TO FORM.

Unable to win in honest, scientific, debate, they used every dishonest, that is, loser means to ‘win’ but lost in the end.

Like every such group of losers, be it the dishonest Bilderbergs, the dishonest Trilateralists, the dishonest bankers, the dishonest Zionists, the dishonest government and its dishonest agencies, or the dishonest Illuminati of any kind, what you have among losers is a classic circle jerk that maintains only its criminal interests and intent and denies or conceals its ‘work’ and the ulterior (dishonest) motives under which it operates.

Real scientists, are honest and open. They are objective and let the facts tell the story. They do not write a story to maintain a subjective stance or to protect a lie, as losers do.

Losers, even when they appear to be winning, are losers, nonetheless. Winners have integrity, and even if they appear to be losing, their integrity wins.

Here’s an interesting new conspiracy theory from R.P. Frye, posted on Orly Taitz‘ blog, regarding the antipresident, Soetoro/Obama. Of course, he doesn’t see that the Marxism of the Soviet Union is an equally evil twin of Zionism, both hatched by the Rothschilds and their ilk.

To: “J B Williams”

Having read and listened to many bits and pieces of the Obama enigma, I have my own version of what may have brought us to this absurd point in American history. I am an aeronautical engineer, not a political scientist or historian, but I have enjoyed a career in the military aircraft business ( Convair & General Dynamics) during the height of the Cold War. Later, I worked closely with foreign military and industrial agencies in Europe and the Mid-East.
Anyone who thinks the Cold War ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union is extremely niave or hasn’t been paying attention to the real world. We broke the Russians economically and reduced their military threat, but we did not change their attitude towards us as some people choose to believe—indeed, we gave them more incentive to do us harm.
During the height of the Cold War,1950’sthrough 1970’s, the Soviets spent large sums of money on many efforts to damage the US. There were short term efforts like arming the Cubans and more subtile, long term undertakings to undermine our way of life. I think we’re experiencing the results of latter now.
To create the perfect Manchurian Candidate, one would need to start very early and completely control the environment and make the background untraceable. Post-war Hawaii would be the ideal place from which to work. It was of mixed ethnic backgrounds, loosely governed, and a fertile area for communistic activities. The efforts of the US to bring the islands into statehood were not totally popular. Indeed, some of the land is not US-governed.
Hawaii would provide tha Where.

In order to obscure the background of the “chosen one”, what better way than to kidnap a baby and give him a set of chosen parents who would raise and train him in the desired manner. The Royal Lands of Hawaii provided the ideal source for the acquisition of a child in that it was a sovereign territory not under US authority and with minimal crime fighting resources. It would not be hard to find candidate “parents” in the progressive college group of young communists present in Hawaii at the time. It would be an honor to serve the cause—and there would be money involved, of course. Barack H. Obama and Sidney Dunham were almost perfect for the task—both were into the young people’s progressive movement and her father was well into the local Red element. They also met the requirement for a mixed marriage in that the Hawaiian baby was dark skinned.
Barack Obama Sr. and Sidney Dunham provided the Who.

This hypothesis would seem to answer some of the anomolies of the Obama episode that have surfaced thus far.
—Why did S A D look unpregnant in a photo on the beach shortly before the supposed birth,
—Why is there little or no documentation of the wedding–no guests, no family, no records,
— Why is the residence listed on COLB (filed but not registered) that of the Grandparents,
—Why did BHO Sr. maintain his own apartment after the marriage–there’s no address for the married couple,
—Why or how did S A D get registered in college in Washington state 15 days after the proclaimed date of birth.

The raising and indoctrination of a child would have been easy in Communistic environment of Hawaii. The Dunham grandparents had the political and financial connections ( Davis, the Ford Foundation, et al) to make the arrangement work.The Soviet connection was easy to maintain in Hawaii but Obama Sr. separated from his ” family” and went to Indonesia.Not too much later he died in an auto “accident”. That took care of any possible loose ends.
Sidney remarried and lived in Indonesia where Obama Jr.(now Soetoro) went to school as a Muslim. ThatIs not bad from the Soviet point of view. It would add to the obscuration of the evolving personage. Sidney worked in several banking/real estate scams in Indonesia and developed contacts with anumber of American leftist organizations. For whatever reason, it became desirable for her to drop out of the picture, so she “died” of cancer. No hospital records of treatment, no death certificate, just gone. There are several indications that she surfaced in Washington state under a variation of names—again, in the banking/real estate world. How odd.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Communist/Socialist activities in America had made considerable inroads in the Democratic Party, both locally and nationally. It was not difficult at all to insert a bright, well trained agent into local politics in an area where the groundwork had been laid by corruption and infiltrated labor/community organizations.
This long term effort provided the How.

In 2008, the American people, with the help of some “innovative” voting, did exactly what the Soviets had set in motion many years ago. There are a great many holes in the background of the illegal alien who occupies the White House, but thus far, no viable challenge has been raised.
Now is the time—-Let’s Roll !!!
R.P. Frye

November 18, 2009

Continental Congress 2009:
Bold Plan of Resistance Emerging

Stark Instructions to State and Federal Officials Coming Forth

Delegates Plan Potent Acts of Civic Resistance

After a week of intense committee deliberations, sometimes extending well into the early morning hours, the first formal resolutions of Continental Congress 2009 have begun to emerge. On Tuesday, the Congress adopted resolutions aimed to ending the federal income tax fraud and terminating all state and federal firearms regulations as de facto violations of the plain language of the Second Amendment.

As each of these first resolutions was adopted by the Assembly, they were loudly and spontaneously celebrated by the assembled Delegates, with jubilant energy and great emotion at the emergence of these first acts of nationally organized resistance to emerge from the Congress.

If these initial resolutions are any indication, the Congress clearly has set its collective intent to adopting a volume of provocative and far-reaching “Remedial Instructions” and “Civic Actions” to restore the Constitution, and which effects will soon reverberate from sea-to-shining-sea.

The Income Tax Instruction to the United States Congress adopted by the Continental Congress cites several essential facts in U.S. law, including irrefutable documentation establishing that the 16th Amendment is void, ab initio, due to its failure to be properly ratified, and that any direct, un-apportioned tax on the labor of any American is wholly unconstitutional. The resolution cites the U.S. Supreme Court holding that labor (and the fruits thereof) are, “.the most sacred and inviolable” property of the citizens of the nation. (Citing Butcher’s Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, 757)

The tax resolution also calls for Congress to execute the immediate cessation of the (unlawful) imposition of the practice of withholding of earnings from the paychecks of American citizens and for the Congress to immediately release and restore all citizens wrongfully imprisoned as a result of the “unconstitutional application of the income tax” (laws).

The Civic Actions recommended by the Congress for the People to end the Income Tax fraud include for the People to contact their local sheriff and demand cooperation with the citizenry to provide protection from (unlawful) federal and state tax enforcement actions (including fraudulent, non-judicial “administrative” IRS liens and levys), that citizens prepare to replace or otherwise recall or impeach any sheriff who refuses to protect their local citizens from “.rogue federal agents acting under color of law,” and for citizens to prepare themselves to withhold their monies as a means to secure Redress.

As to the Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms, the resolution of the Continental Congress declares that all regulations, state and federal, which are repugnant to the express language of the Second Amendment are “.null and void - including but not limited to, illegal and unconstitutional restrictions on open and/or concealed carry.”

The arms resolution calls for the citizenry to coordinate with their local county Sheriff in establishing a Constitutional Militia, inherently separate from the state National Guard. Such militia would be a constitutional defense force, “comprising all citizenry capable of bearing arms and under proper authority, in defense of themselves and the states.”

Official copies of these resolutions and others will be released shortly for public inspection and distribution. Committee and sub-committee work on “Remedial Instructions” for state and federal officials will by decree, end at midnight Wednesday (Nov. 18).

Starting tomorrow (Thursday) , the Congress begins two and a half days of intense deliberations, turning their sole attention to debating and adopting a comprehensive set of potent “Civic Actions” every American can implement, en masse, to effect a peaceful restoration of Constitutional Order.

These lawful, (non-violent) civic actions, (fully lawful and protected by the Right to enforce the First Amendment Right to Petition), will be designed to significantly affect the functioning of both state and federal institutions which have been complicit in enabling or otherwise aiding or allowing the destruction of the Constitution and/or the Fundamental Rights of the People.

On Saturday afternoon, the agenda plans for the Delegates set to move to adopt the full package consisting of First Amendment Petitions for Redress of Grievances, “Remedial Instructions” to be served upon state and federal officials, and the slate of “Civic Actions” designed for everyday Americans to implement to resist the tyrants and engage in the battle to restore Liberty.

The final package generated by the Congress will be formally known as the “Articles of Association” and signed (Saturday afternoon) by the Delegates of Continental Congress 2009. Means are currently being developed for citizens everywhere across America to likewise sign the Articles of Association and join the battle to hold our government accountable to the Law.

The current intent for the Articles of Association is that when “x” million (tbd) Americans publicly commit to personally embrace and execute at least some portion of the (peaceful) plan of Civic resistance, the plan of “Civic Actions” will be fully activated and its full effects soon manifest against our errant institutions of government. More details will be announced following the conclusion of the CC2009 assembly on November 21.

Donations Still Needed – Please!

The WTP Foundation has significant costs it must still cover in connection with hosting and producing the Continental Congress 2009 event, including the cost of the professionally produced webcast enabling thousands to witness the full proceedings of this historic event at no cost.

Please consider a fully tax-deductible donation to the 501©3 WTP Foundation or to receive the beautiful .999 pure silver CC2009 commemorative medallion. Again, we offer many, many thanks for your support that has made this event possible thus far.

We urge everyone to please consider making a of any amount and support this critical initiative to restore our Founding Principles and protect the Light of Liberty. (If you have not visited our website before, please first join our email list.)

Constitutionally speaking, what’s the difference between a Shawn Hannity and a George Soros, a Rush Limbaugh and a Bill Maher, a conservative and a liberal?

Simply stated, a liberal wipes his ass with the Constitution, a conservative wipes his feet on it.

It would be funny, if it wasn’t so true.

As most of you already know, CC2009 is now in session in St. Charles, Illinois, and can be viewed live through November 22nd.

“Beyond ‘Tea Parties.’ Beyond Elections. It’s Time To Hold Our Government Accountable – Peacefully.” is their slogan, and restoration, not revolution, is the stated purpose, with a return to Constitutional rule, that is legal rule, as the agenda.

These heroic patriots are acting in the cherished, American tradition that established this nation, but you would think they were meeting in secret like the sleazy Bilderberg syndicate by how little coverage this historic event is receiving. And they don’t need goon squads and sound cannons to keep the people off the streets of St. Charles, as we recently saw in Pittsburgh at the meeting of the G-20 cabal, either.

Some Patriots have attempted to take Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals” and turn what Alinsky suggests doing against the enemy.

Our approach is different. Domestic Enemies Net is now creating a set of rules that Patriots can use to their advantage in taking America back. These are not rules for non-competitive, non-productive Marxist losers but for the competitive, freedom-loving, true Americans that all real Patriots are. The first of these Rules For Patriots has been posted.

Leo C. Donofrio, who last year was involved in an eligibility suit against Soetoro/Obama by way of New Jersey Secretary of State, Nina Mitchell Wells as the defendant, has a different take on judge David Carter’s dismissal of Orly Taitz’ action against this anti-president.

He agrees with Judge Carter’s decision that:

The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district.

When the Attorney General and the Department of Justice blew Orly off on a writ of quo warranto request, she had the opportunity to take it up herself through the DC court and still does, given the proper plaintiff.

Donofrio writes:

POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE.

Congress is the branch the Constitution empowers to remove a sitting President. The power to judicially enforce any review of POTUS eligibility is a pre-requisite to judicial involvement as the federal courts do not have the power to issue simple advisory opinions. A declaratory judgment is more than an advisory opinion. This is because a declaratory judgment must have the power of enforcement attached whereas an advisory opinion does not.

The declaratory judgment requests of plaintiffs in the Barnett case had to be dismissed because the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. It’s really that simple. Judge Carter’s analysis of this issue was perfect.

QUO WARRANTO

Because a quo warranto is the only proper action to review the eligibility of a sitting President – and because such an action requires a trial of facts - Congress empowered the DC District Court to hold such a trial (by jury if requested by either party) when the eligibility of the President (or any US national office holder) is called into question.

There is no political question doctrine defense available to a sitting President for a quo warranto brought in the DC District Court. This is because Congress properly exercised its Constitutional authority to review a President’s eligibility via the quo warranto statute which also provides for the removal of an ineligible person from that office if necessary.

The US Attorney General and the US attorney have been empowered by Congress to institute a quo warranto on their own volition. Furthermore, any person may request that these officers do the same. If consent is not given by the DOJ, section 3503 of the quo warranto statute allows an “interested person” to petition the DC District Court on its own. The Barnett plaintiffs failed to avail themselves of this option.

Additionally, the Department of Justice has created a genuine conflict of interest as to 3502 requests by any “third person” (meaning any citizen). By defending the President in this eligibility litigation involving quo warranto, it isn’t possible for the Department of Justice to remain impartial.

Therefore, either a special prosecutor must be named for purposes of allowing the Congressional intent of the quo warranto statute to be realized, or the DC District Court may waive the requirement and examine any verified petition on its own consent.

The conflict will eventually be tested in the DC District Court.

Meanwhile, it’s important for me to point out that everything I have told readers of this blog about quo warranto was confirmed by Judge Carter today.

Leo comes across as very level-headed, so it could be he reads law better than Taitz, Berg, and Kreep, the other attorneys most involved in the eligibility challenge, right now.

You can find further discussion of the quo warranto issue at his Natural Born Citizen blog.