Strategy & Tactics

The information war is a guerrilla war, but they want it to be regimented and fought in a controlled press, in media controlled by them, in other words where the info war has no possibility of being fought.

But the info war is a guerrilla war. They make their move and put out their propaganda. We, in turn, hit them from every direction, not as an army but in loosely structured groups like the tea parties, and has individuals posting on the Internet, uploading videos, handing out films, passing out fliers, each in their own direction, each at their own pace.

So of course they want to redesign and restructure the Internet or be able to shut it down at a moment’s notice. But doing so, if they really can – and there are some indications that they cannot – will only serve to grow the guerrilla movement against them.

While the guerrilla based info war is a strategy, it is an accidental strategy, an organic strategy that naturally grows out of their repression. By pointing out that it can be a conscious strategy, and that it should be used deliberately as such and not just haphazardly as it has mostly been, to date, it can be used much more actively and effectively to blunt their offensives in the mainlie media, expose them as the domestic enemies and losers that they are, and ultimately send all those who participated in this treasonous war against America and the Constitution, to prison where they belong.

These are surprise, unannounced, appearances by prepared persons at public meetings, including those of state and municipal governments, designed to confront, get answers, and if appropriate embarrass people into doing the right thing or finding another line of work.

What such tactics do is throw the enemy off balance by bringing the truth directly to their door then making the confrontation up-close-and-personal by publicly throwing their lies into their deceitful, thieving faces.

‘We Are Change’ groups in various parts of the country showed the effectiveness of such tactics by going to Al Gore’s book signings (even buying the book and, in at least one case, tearing up a newly signed copy right in front of him) and shutting him down while embarrassing him with the truth.

What’s important is to have these confrontations recorded by group members and then posted all over the World Wide Web where more can see them than merely the small group attending the event. As a byproduct, some of these might make the local news thereby giving the issues brought up at such confrontations wider exposure.

Similar confrontations earlier in the year had congressmen hiding from constituents with whom they should have been meeting while home on break because there is nothing these vermin are less comfortable with than informed, articulate persons armed with the truth and not afraid to confront them.

As a bonus, when real people enter the political arena and start to take America back, you can use similar white-hat tactics to have a public conversation with like-minded people who stand for liberty and the Constitution, thereby awakening your neighbors to good candidates and through your posted videos lending these good candidates additional, deserved support.

For more about this tactic, see Rule 7, posted earlier today.

Do you know why Alex Jones is so effective?

Because he knows what NOT to talk about.

In the simplest of terms, take a lesson from Alex and keep Zionism and the Illuminati out of your discussion with the people you meet. There is enough out there when it comes to the globalist agenda so that these never need to be mentioned. In fact, not even the ‘new world order’ has to be mentioned.

You may know the groups behind the globalist movement. Those you talk with might eventually get there. But the important thing is getting the information out and getting others to look at if for themselves. This can probably best be accomplished with a burned copy of The Fall Of The Republic.

Mention the Jewish angle, and the response is likely to be, ‘Oh, you’re not one of them, are you?’ Even if they don’t express it verbally, what they have been fed through the media over the years will have them thinking you’re anti-semitic, and turn them off.

Mention the Illuminati, and the response is likely to be, ‘Oh, you’re one of those!’ because what they have been fed through the media over the years will have them thinking you’re just a nut into ‘conspiracy theories,’ and turn them off as well.

As for space aliens, lizard people and the Coast To Coast AM type stuff, forget it. Also forget the religious angle as well. You may know we are dealing with ‘powers and principalities,’ but unless someone is already on that wave length, you are not likely to win them over without a good deal of biblical education, and there just isn’t time.

So do what Alex does, and just stick to the basics. The enemy would like nothing better than to have your energy drained off into non-productive methods that are likely to only get you laughed at and ignored.

What Alex Jones talks about can be documented. It is in their writings and in the news. It is not theory but the reality in which we find ourselves, today. And as he has demonstrated, it is what really works. Use it.

Aside from the obstacle which is the sheer size of America and her population, our nation has some 25,000,000 veterans leavened throughout its 308,000,000 people. That’s 8.1%, about 8 per 100 Americans.

Not all veterans are combat veterans, neither have most of them served in a war zone in any capacity. For example, while 9,087,000 Americans served on active duty between August 5, 1964 and May 7, 1975, the official Vietnam era, only 2,709,918 actually served in Vietnam. That’s less than a third. Most of the rest either stayed stateside or were sent to Germany or Korea.

Small as that number might be, proportionally, there is something all veterans have in common: they completed basic combat training and at the very least are still capable of firing a rifle accurately. And while practice helps, firing a rifle is a lot like riding a bike; you don’t really forget.

From U.S. Census data, in 2004 there were 24.5 million veterans in the U.S. and in 2007, 23.7 million. If, as stated in a Veteran’s Day article last week, there are now 25 million veterans in America, it must mean veterans of the Afghanistan and Iraq era are growing at a faster rate than the remaining octogenarians of WWII pass.

I don’t know what the globalists are considering, but I have to think that most veterans believe in America and will stand by her. Even among the remaining 8,000,000 badly maligned Vietnam veterans* most of whom are in their late 50’s or early 60’s, 91% of them are happy to have served in Vietnam and 74% say they would do it again.

If they would be willing to do that again, I am sure they would be willing to stand up for America when globalist aggression against America is in their face, as would all who proudly served their country and understood the situation. They’ve already done it once, and not even on home turf. I believe they would do it again.

* How could the Vietnam war be called lost when Americans never lost a significant battle, kicked serious ass during Tet, and had cordially left Vietnam under a signed peace accord 2 years before Saigon fell because congress cut off funds to the South Vietnamese after North Vietnam resumed aggression with Russian and Chinese aid? But that’s the way the dishonest, agenda driven media spins things.

How the enemy loves to point to Supreme Court decisions, except when they go against them. They especially hate Marbury vs. Madison, the 1803 decision that stated “All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”

The elements of the criminal government don’t like to hear that any of laws they are enforcing are null and void. In other words, that such laws are not laws at all. Furthermore, they don’t like the idea that if they are not laws, they need not be obeyed and should not be enforced.

Beginning at least with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and multiplying into today, such repugnant laws are the federal government’s stock in trade and a plague upon the republic.

Agencies enforcing such non-laws are acting under color of law and acting illegally.

According to the FBI’s web site, Title 18, United States Code, Section 242 “makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.”

The DOJ web site states, “Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” It adds, “The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.”

But it’s done every day, wittingly and unwittingly.

To make sure they know they are acting wittingly, that is willfully, we could do their take and ‘Mirandize’ them — ‘read them their rights’ – let them know that the law they are acting under is unconstitutional, null and void, unenforceable, and that if they proceed to act under color of law, anything they say or do will be used against them in a court of law.

That’s one option, and as awareness grows, a possibility.

Bringing suit for civil rights violations could be another.

But how about a grass roots movement of Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification of laws repugnant to the Constitution. Something done on a county level that would certainly give them pause and let them know that they would be held accountable for their actions if they proceeded to enforce such non-laws.

I bring up the county level since your sheriff has the ultimate law enforcement authority in your county. His authority trumps state and federal authority. Most people wrongly think in a hierarchical manner and assume state trumps county and federal trumps state. Not so.

If you’ve ever seen the James Bond film, Live And Let Die, you might have been surprised to see Sheriff J. W. Pepper, his own patrol car demolished, walk right up to a Louisiana State Police cruiser that arrives on the scene, put his hand on the hood, and say “By the power invested in me by this parish, I hereby do commandeer this vehicle and all those persons within.”

That’s right, he takes control of two Louisiana State Troopers and their cruiser, and they don’t say a thing.

Then, when he arrives at the scene of the boat chase on the bayou, he comes out of the car authoritatively announcing to the State Police on the scene, “I’m in charge, here…” and to the troopers he commandeered, “you two boys come on.”

Before we go further, you should be aware that there is such a thing as jury nullification, whereby juries have rendered decisions in favor of the accused when they have thought the law or its application was unfair. Naturally, the courts don’t like it and judges tend to give wrong instructions to juries to avoid it. If you are unfamiliar with jury nullification, see FIJA, the Fully Informed Jury Association, to learn more.

Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification would work in a similar way, that is, people would just refuse to obey unconstitutional laws because they are null and void and have no legal power. Large enough numbers of people could do this on their own and make enforcement impossible, such as with the federal income tax where those acting under color of law, tax courts included, can not show anyone the law – the actual legal authority – by which the income tax is being imposed on individual citizens.

However, the option of using the authority of the sheriffs of this nation to confront and jail the perpetrators, if necessary, can be a viable and far less risky solution as far as we the people are concerned.

Sheriffs can be educated as to their rights, duties, and responsibilities under the constitution – Sheriff Richard Mack has written a book about this – and if they cannot, since they are elected officials, they can be replaced by Constitutionally minded individuals wanting to take our nation back, beginning with their own counties.

Since we the people have established government for our benefit, we should, when it becomes detrimental to us by enacting laws that are repugnant to the Constitution – and I will argue that deliberately enacting such laws is treasonous – in some way use Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification to have them abolished, or as charged by the Declaration of Independence, abolish that government completely.

In addition to FIJA, why not also a FISA, a Fully Informed Sheriff Association that instructed the sheriffs of America about their true power in regard to the Constitution? Then, when any repugnant and Constitutionally offensive law came along, we could place the sheriff on notice that such a law is not Constitutional law and will be ignored, and that we expect him to be faithful to and uphold the Constitution, protect the citizens that elected him for their protection, and tell any federal agents that enter his county that they are out of bounds, and that if they act under color of law they will be arrested for acting under color of law and for criminal contempt of the Constitution.