Strategy & Tactics

The information war is a guerrilla war, but they want it to be regimented and fought in a controlled press, in media controlled by them, in other words where the info war has no possibility of being fought.

But the info war is a guerrilla war. They make their move and put out their propaganda. We, in turn, hit them from every direction, not as an army but in loosely structured groups like the tea parties, and has individuals posting on the Internet, uploading videos, handing out films, passing out fliers, each in their own direction, each at their own pace.

So of course they want to redesign and restructure the Internet or be able to shut it down at a moment’s notice. But doing so, if they really can – and there are some indications that they cannot – will only serve to grow the guerrilla movement against them.

While the guerrilla based info war is a strategy, it is an accidental strategy, an organic strategy that naturally grows out of their repression. By pointing out that it can be a conscious strategy, and that it should be used deliberately as such and not just haphazardly as it has mostly been, to date, it can be used much more actively and effectively to blunt their offensives in the mainlie media, expose them as the domestic enemies and losers that they are, and ultimately send all those who participated in this treasonous war against America and the Constitution, to prison where they belong.

Do you know why Alex Jones is so effective?

Because he knows what NOT to talk about.

In the simplest of terms, take a lesson from Alex and keep Zionism and the Illuminati out of your discussion with the people you meet. There is enough out there when it comes to the globalist agenda so that these never need to be mentioned. In fact, not even the ‘new world order’ has to be mentioned.

You may know the groups behind the globalist movement. Those you talk with might eventually get there. But the important thing is getting the information out and getting others to look at if for themselves. This can probably best be accomplished with a burned copy of The Fall Of The Republic.

Mention the Jewish angle, and the response is likely to be, ‘Oh, you’re not one of them, are you?’ Even if they don’t express it verbally, what they have been fed through the media over the years will have them thinking you’re anti-semitic, and turn them off.

Mention the Illuminati, and the response is likely to be, ‘Oh, you’re one of those!’ because what they have been fed through the media over the years will have them thinking you’re just a nut into ‘conspiracy theories,’ and turn them off as well.

As for space aliens, lizard people and the Coast To Coast AM type stuff, forget it. Also forget the religious angle as well. You may know we are dealing with ‘powers and principalities,’ but unless someone is already on that wave length, you are not likely to win them over without a good deal of biblical education, and there just isn’t time.

So do what Alex does, and just stick to the basics. The enemy would like nothing better than to have your energy drained off into non-productive methods that are likely to only get you laughed at and ignored.

What Alex Jones talks about can be documented. It is in their writings and in the news. It is not theory but the reality in which we find ourselves, today. And as he has demonstrated, it is what really works. Use it.

How the enemy loves to point to Supreme Court decisions, except when they go against them. They especially hate Marbury vs. Madison, the 1803 decision that stated “All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”

The elements of the criminal government don’t like to hear that any of laws they are enforcing are null and void. In other words, that such laws are not laws at all. Furthermore, they don’t like the idea that if they are not laws, they need not be obeyed and should not be enforced.

Beginning at least with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and multiplying into today, such repugnant laws are the federal government’s stock in trade and a plague upon the republic.

Agencies enforcing such non-laws are acting under color of law and acting illegally.

According to the FBI’s web site, Title 18, United States Code, Section 242 “makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.”

The DOJ web site states, “Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” It adds, “The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.”

But it’s done every day, wittingly and unwittingly.

To make sure they know they are acting wittingly, that is willfully, we could do their take and ‘Mirandize’ them — ‘read them their rights’ – let them know that the law they are acting under is unconstitutional, null and void, unenforceable, and that if they proceed to act under color of law, anything they say or do will be used against them in a court of law.

That’s one option, and as awareness grows, a possibility.

Bringing suit for civil rights violations could be another.

But how about a grass roots movement of Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification of laws repugnant to the Constitution. Something done on a county level that would certainly give them pause and let them know that they would be held accountable for their actions if they proceeded to enforce such non-laws.

I bring up the county level since your sheriff has the ultimate law enforcement authority in your county. His authority trumps state and federal authority. Most people wrongly think in a hierarchical manner and assume state trumps county and federal trumps state. Not so.

If you’ve ever seen the James Bond film, Live And Let Die, you might have been surprised to see Sheriff J. W. Pepper, his own patrol car demolished, walk right up to a Louisiana State Police cruiser that arrives on the scene, put his hand on the hood, and say “By the power invested in me by this parish, I hereby do commandeer this vehicle and all those persons within.”

That’s right, he takes control of two Louisiana State Troopers and their cruiser, and they don’t say a thing.

Then, when he arrives at the scene of the boat chase on the bayou, he comes out of the car authoritatively announcing to the State Police on the scene, “I’m in charge, here…” and to the troopers he commandeered, “you two boys come on.”

Before we go further, you should be aware that there is such a thing as jury nullification, whereby juries have rendered decisions in favor of the accused when they have thought the law or its application was unfair. Naturally, the courts don’t like it and judges tend to give wrong instructions to juries to avoid it. If you are unfamiliar with jury nullification, see FIJA, the Fully Informed Jury Association, to learn more.

Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification would work in a similar way, that is, people would just refuse to obey unconstitutional laws because they are null and void and have no legal power. Large enough numbers of people could do this on their own and make enforcement impossible, such as with the federal income tax where those acting under color of law, tax courts included, can not show anyone the law – the actual legal authority – by which the income tax is being imposed on individual citizens.

However, the option of using the authority of the sheriffs of this nation to confront and jail the perpetrators, if necessary, can be a viable and far less risky solution as far as we the people are concerned.

Sheriffs can be educated as to their rights, duties, and responsibilities under the constitution – Sheriff Richard Mack has written a book about this – and if they cannot, since they are elected officials, they can be replaced by Constitutionally minded individuals wanting to take our nation back, beginning with their own counties.

Since we the people have established government for our benefit, we should, when it becomes detrimental to us by enacting laws that are repugnant to the Constitution – and I will argue that deliberately enacting such laws is treasonous – in some way use Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification to have them abolished, or as charged by the Declaration of Independence, abolish that government completely.

In addition to FIJA, why not also a FISA, a Fully Informed Sheriff Association that instructed the sheriffs of America about their true power in regard to the Constitution? Then, when any repugnant and Constitutionally offensive law came along, we could place the sheriff on notice that such a law is not Constitutional law and will be ignored, and that we expect him to be faithful to and uphold the Constitution, protect the citizens that elected him for their protection, and tell any federal agents that enter his county that they are out of bounds, and that if they act under color of law they will be arrested for acting under color of law and for criminal contempt of the Constitution.

Before the World Wide Web (WWW) came into its own in the latter 1990’s, the BBS or Bulletin Board System was the popular means of communicating by computer.

In fact, CompuServe started out as little more than a subscription BBS that I remember signing onto with a 300/1200 baud modem – that’s slow – and the service was priced by the speed used to access it. It was straight line text. When America Online came in with GeoWorks, subscribers were given a graphic interface that was easy to use. GeoWorks was eventually replaced with HTML when, for all practical purposes, the World Wide Web became the Internet and AOL went in that direction.

However, aside from a few big dial-up services such as CommpuServe, Prodigy, and AOL, the country was linked by a network of individually operated BBS’s that for some sysops (system operators) were a way of life. They offered games, file downloads, and discussion boards that attracted users and kept hobby oriented sysops happily occupied.

A few of these BBS’s had some national recognition, in other words, some people used them despite the high cost of long distance telephone service at the time. There were even one or two slick magazines devoted exclusively to the BBS and the sysops that ran them. Slick magazines meant that publishers saw money, there. Yes, BBS’s were popular.

During the 1990’s, there were probably a couple dozen such BBS’s operating simultaneously just in our local calling area. Nationwide, there were thousands. With the WWW taking hold in the latter 1990’s, the BBS’s began to fade away completely, or take to the Internet by way of Telnet. And today, there are only some 400 BBS’s left within the USA and Canada. These are Telnet BBS’s, accessed through the Internet. As for the old-style dial-up modem BBS, only 40 exist, virtually all accessible by Telnet as well.

Since everyone from Obama, to Rupert Murdock, to various federal agencies is talking about being able to close down the Internet or turn it into something that would prevent the free flow of information, bringing back the BBS is something some of us in the patriot movement should be working on as a back up system for disseminating information and providing support in the cause of liberty.

Because the dial-up Bulletin Board System relies on a network of private BBS’s, the only way to shut it down would be to eliminate land-line telephone service.

Anything that can be turned into a zip file can be transmitted by BBS. And such files spread quickly over the system for download and use nationwide. Sysops wanting to keep their boards and information fresh, insured this.

There was also FidoNet, a BBS Netmail and discussion board service that loosely interconnected participating BBS’s and would spread information across the boards overnight.

Dial-up BBS’s ran on the simplest equipment, IBM PC’s or PC-XT’s, 286’s, 386’s and maybe a few 486’s near the end of their popularity. Most used only a single phone line, though some sysops would pay for two or more lines to increase capacity. But because there were so many BBS’s, a user could generally hook up with one whenever they wanted, and some would jump around from board to board. Fidonet helped keep the flow of information in sync.

You can find BBS software free online. We used Searchlight (SLBBS) and there is an archive of old SLBBS software available. If you happened to be involved as a sysop or even an active user and preferred another software, archives for Wildcat and others must be available, as well. You will need MS-DOS to run most of it, though some was being made for Windows 95, the last version of Windows before the Internet craze turned the BBS into technology’s buggy whip. A modem communications program such as Ripterm or Qmodem (both handling RIP graphics for SLBBS) would also be needed. Callers would need such communication software, as well.

With the Internet in peril and the free flow of news and information in jeopardy, the old-style dial-up BBS would be the ideal way to decentralize the flow and take it out of the hands of the government/media cabal.

We should begin taking steps toward bringing back the dial-up (not the Telnet Internet dependent) BBS right now, or at least toward being ready with the software (and, if necessary, possibly some antiquated computer equipment and operating systems, specifically DOS and/or Windows 95) to quickly put the individual Bulletin Board Systems back into play. It would mean some experimentation to regain the knowledge that has been lost and to see how dial-up BBS software (not Telnet BBS software) takes to modern machines that run so much faster than even the high-end 486’s of the time.

Dial-up BBS’s might not be as pretty and easy to use as the web has become, but in time of need, would be very functional.