Strategy & Tactics

These are surprise, unannounced, appearances by prepared persons at public meetings, including those of state and municipal governments, designed to confront, get answers, and if appropriate embarrass people into doing the right thing or finding another line of work.

What such tactics do is throw the enemy off balance by bringing the truth directly to their door then making the confrontation up-close-and-personal by publicly throwing their lies into their deceitful, thieving faces.

‘We Are Change’ groups in various parts of the country showed the effectiveness of such tactics by going to Al Gore’s book signings (even buying the book and, in at least one case, tearing up a newly signed copy right in front of him) and shutting him down while embarrassing him with the truth.

What’s important is to have these confrontations recorded by group members and then posted all over the World Wide Web where more can see them than merely the small group attending the event. As a byproduct, some of these might make the local news thereby giving the issues brought up at such confrontations wider exposure.

Similar confrontations earlier in the year had congressmen hiding from constituents with whom they should have been meeting while home on break because there is nothing these vermin are less comfortable with than informed, articulate persons armed with the truth and not afraid to confront them.

As a bonus, when real people enter the political arena and start to take America back, you can use similar white-hat tactics to have a public conversation with like-minded people who stand for liberty and the Constitution, thereby awakening your neighbors to good candidates and through your posted videos lending these good candidates additional, deserved support.

For more about this tactic, see Rule 7, posted earlier today.

How the enemy loves to point to Supreme Court decisions, except when they go against them. They especially hate Marbury vs. Madison, the 1803 decision that stated “All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”

The elements of the criminal government don’t like to hear that any of laws they are enforcing are null and void. In other words, that such laws are not laws at all. Furthermore, they don’t like the idea that if they are not laws, they need not be obeyed and should not be enforced.

Beginning at least with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and multiplying into today, such repugnant laws are the federal government’s stock in trade and a plague upon the republic.

Agencies enforcing such non-laws are acting under color of law and acting illegally.

According to the FBI’s web site, Title 18, United States Code, Section 242 “makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.”

The DOJ web site states, “Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” It adds, “The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.”

But it’s done every day, wittingly and unwittingly.

To make sure they know they are acting wittingly, that is willfully, we could do their take and ‘Mirandize’ them — ‘read them their rights’ – let them know that the law they are acting under is unconstitutional, null and void, unenforceable, and that if they proceed to act under color of law, anything they say or do will be used against them in a court of law.

That’s one option, and as awareness grows, a possibility.

Bringing suit for civil rights violations could be another.

But how about a grass roots movement of Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification of laws repugnant to the Constitution. Something done on a county level that would certainly give them pause and let them know that they would be held accountable for their actions if they proceeded to enforce such non-laws.

I bring up the county level since your sheriff has the ultimate law enforcement authority in your county. His authority trumps state and federal authority. Most people wrongly think in a hierarchical manner and assume state trumps county and federal trumps state. Not so.

If you’ve ever seen the James Bond film, Live And Let Die, you might have been surprised to see Sheriff J. W. Pepper, his own patrol car demolished, walk right up to a Louisiana State Police cruiser that arrives on the scene, put his hand on the hood, and say “By the power invested in me by this parish, I hereby do commandeer this vehicle and all those persons within.”

That’s right, he takes control of two Louisiana State Troopers and their cruiser, and they don’t say a thing.

Then, when he arrives at the scene of the boat chase on the bayou, he comes out of the car authoritatively announcing to the State Police on the scene, “I’m in charge, here…” and to the troopers he commandeered, “you two boys come on.”

Before we go further, you should be aware that there is such a thing as jury nullification, whereby juries have rendered decisions in favor of the accused when they have thought the law or its application was unfair. Naturally, the courts don’t like it and judges tend to give wrong instructions to juries to avoid it. If you are unfamiliar with jury nullification, see FIJA, the Fully Informed Jury Association, to learn more.

Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification would work in a similar way, that is, people would just refuse to obey unconstitutional laws because they are null and void and have no legal power. Large enough numbers of people could do this on their own and make enforcement impossible, such as with the federal income tax where those acting under color of law, tax courts included, can not show anyone the law – the actual legal authority – by which the income tax is being imposed on individual citizens.

However, the option of using the authority of the sheriffs of this nation to confront and jail the perpetrators, if necessary, can be a viable and far less risky solution as far as we the people are concerned.

Sheriffs can be educated as to their rights, duties, and responsibilities under the constitution – Sheriff Richard Mack has written a book about this – and if they cannot, since they are elected officials, they can be replaced by Constitutionally minded individuals wanting to take our nation back, beginning with their own counties.

Since we the people have established government for our benefit, we should, when it becomes detrimental to us by enacting laws that are repugnant to the Constitution – and I will argue that deliberately enacting such laws is treasonous – in some way use Civil Nullification or Citizen Nullification to have them abolished, or as charged by the Declaration of Independence, abolish that government completely.

In addition to FIJA, why not also a FISA, a Fully Informed Sheriff Association that instructed the sheriffs of America about their true power in regard to the Constitution? Then, when any repugnant and Constitutionally offensive law came along, we could place the sheriff on notice that such a law is not Constitutional law and will be ignored, and that we expect him to be faithful to and uphold the Constitution, protect the citizens that elected him for their protection, and tell any federal agents that enter his county that they are out of bounds, and that if they act under color of law they will be arrested for acting under color of law and for criminal contempt of the Constitution.

Call your representatives in Washington. You have two Senators from your state and a member of the House or Representatives from your district.

Tell him you want to talk about the health care bill or whatever bill it is. Right now, because it’s hot, say you would like to talk about the ‘cap and trade’ carbon tax, completely bankrupt America bill.

Ask him if he is voting in favor of the bill.

If he says he is, ask him if he’s read all of it yet.

If he hasn’t, ask him why he doesn’t think that’s irresponsible behavior.

Ask him who wrote it and why he trusts them.

Tell him he is your agent in Washington and that you expect him to read every piece of legislation that he votes on, on your behalf.

Ask him if he has heard of Marbury vs. Madison, where the Supreme Court clearly and succinctly stated that laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.

Ask him why he keeps voting for legislation that is repugnant to the Constitution.

Tell him that you expect him to live up to his oath to the Constitution and that his primary function in Congress is to vigilantly stand guard over the rights and liberties of we the people, and the national interests of the United States of America.

Tell him that he has perjured himself in his oath to the Constitution if he fails to do that.

Tell him that you expect him to look after the Constitutional interests of the people that elected him, and not the special interests of the banks, insurance companies, drug companies and the other corporations that have bought him. Depending on the mood, you might throw in the Jewish lobby.

If he thinks your remark is anti-semitic, tell him to think again and stop crying ‘wolf,’ since the Jews behind AIPAC are all or virtually all non-semitic Zionists who treat the real, semitic, Palestinian Jews in Israel like second class citizens, and that by not putting America’s interests first, you think he is being un-American.

Tell him a corporation is not one of ‘we the people.’ It has no inherent or Creator-endowed rights, only people do.

Tell him that America is aware of the sham and that we are working to replace bought and paid for career politicians, such as himself, with responsible citizens who will protect our rights and America’s liberty since the Constitution guarantees them, and that you won’t be voting for him because neither you nor the Constitution are really in his heart.

If a politician you don’t appreciate asks you how you are going to vote or says he hopes you will vote for him, tell him you select candidates by random drawing and will put his name in a hat.

If there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between them, give them even odds.

You can also tell him how a random drawing agrees with the socialism they favor, levels the playing field, and gives everyone an equal chance.

You can also tell him you’ll have to check with your ‘Wee Gee Board’ first (but don’t really mess with that), to see what the demons suggest.

That’s right, a vote for a bad candidate is a vote for a bad system – or as some will say, the lesser of two evils is still evil.

Voting for candidates whose views are unknown is like congress voting for legislation they haven’t read. Don’t do it!

On the other side of things, with an awakening populace there will be many candidates coming along who believe in America, in liberty, and in the Constitution. Support them, lump the rest.

And teach others to do the same.

Election day is Tuesday, so this is just an easy tactic to get things started.